Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd. v. United States

30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1051, 2006 CIT 113
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 358 F. Supp. 2d 1293
United States Court of International Trade·Decided July 25, 2006·No. Court 04-00493·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

MUSGRAVE, Judge:

This matter having been submitted for decision, and the Court having duly deliberated and now concluding that the second Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand dated July 19, 2006, in which the defendant explains that the lines of computer programming described in Slip Op. 06-96 (June 23, 2006) accomplishes both a circumstance-of-sale adjustment for differences in commissions pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 351.410(b) as well as the 351.410(e) adjustment at issue (i.e., commissions paid in one market but not the other), are reasonable, and upon all other papers and proceedings, now, therefore, in view of the foregoing, it is hereby

ORDERED that judgment be, and it hereby is, rendered in favor of defendant, and it is further

ORDERED that Certain Preserved Mushrooms From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative.Review, 69 Fed. Reg. 51630 (Aug. 20, 2004), as amended 69 Fed. Reg. 55405 (Sep. 14, 2004) be, and they hereby are, sustained, and it is further

ORDERED that all issues having been decided, this matter is concluded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd. v. United States, 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1051, 2006 CIT 113 (cit 2006).

30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1051 (Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related