Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports·Decided January 27, 2005·Published

Opinion

Dr. Robert Hodges Chair, Florida Child Abuse Death Review Team 4052 Bald Cypress Way, BIN A06 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1700

Dear Dr. Hodges:

On behalf of the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee, you ask substantially the following question:

In light of the repeal of section 383.410, Florida Statutes, which provided for the confidentiality of information obtained by the state or local child abuse death review committee, would the confidentiality provisions of 42 United States Code 5106a apply to such committees?

In 1999, the Florida Legislature established the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee within the Department of Health and authorized the creation of local child abuse death review committees.1 The committees are charged with reviewing "the facts and circumstances of all deaths of children from birth through age 18 which occur in this state as the result of verified child abuse or neglect."2 Subsection (8) of section 383.402, Florida Statutes, provides:

"Notwithstanding any other law, the chairperson of the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee, or the chairperson of a local committee, shall be provided with access to any information or records that pertain to a child whose death is being reviewed by the committee and that are necessary for the committee to carry out its duties, including information or records that pertain to the child's family, as follows:

(a) Patient records in the possession of a public or private provider of medical, dental, or mental health care, including, but not limited to, a facility licensed under chapter 393, chapter 394, or chapter 395, or a health care practitioner as defined in s. 456.001. Providers may charge a fee for copies not to exceed 50 cents per page for paper records and $1 per fiche for microfiche records. (b) Information or records of any state agency or political subdivision which might assist a committee in reviewing a child's death, including, but not limited to, information or records of the Department of Children and Family Services, the Department of Health, the Department of Education, or the Department of Juvenile Justice."3

The 1999 Legislature also enacted section 383.410, Florida Statutes, providing for the confidentiality of the information obtained by the committees.4 Section 383.410(3)(b), Florida Statutes, provided that portions of meetings or proceedings of the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee or local committee, or a panel or committee assembled by the state committee or a local committee pursuant to s. 383.402 that relate solely to child fatalities and in which specific persons or incidents are discussed were confidential and exempt from section 286.011, Florida Statutes, and Article I, section 24(b), Florida Constitution.

Subsection (7) of section 383.410, Florida Statutes, states:

"This section is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act of 1995 in accordance with s. 119.15, and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2004, unless reviewed and saved from repeal through reenactment by the Legislature."5

During the 2004 legislative session, legislation was introduced to reenact the provisions of section 383.410, Florida Statutes; however such legislation failed to pass.6 As a result, section 383.410 was "sunsetted" on October 2, 2004, although section 383.402, Florida Statutes, imposing the responsibility on the committees to review child death cases remains. You state that the loss of the confidentiality section has significantly impeded the state committee's ability to carry out its statutory function and to conduct child death reviews under the federal Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA). You ask whether the confidentiality provisions in the federal act would apply while the committee works to restore the confidentiality protections previously contained in section 383.410, Florida Statutes.

Title 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) 5106a provides for grants to states for child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment programs. Subsection (c) of that section provides for the establishment of citizen review panels in states to which a grant has been made pursuant to that section. The functions of such panels are set forth in 42 U.S.C. 5106a(c)(4) and include any other criteria the panel considers important to ensure the protection of children, including —

"(II) a review of child fatalities and near fatalities (as defined in subsection (b)(4))."

The panel is required to prepare and make available to the State and the public on an annual basis a report containing a summary of the activities of the panel and recommendations to improve the child protection services system at the State and local levels.7

You have advised this office that the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee is conducting child death reviews as a citizen review panel under CAPTA. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 5106a(c)(4)(B), members and staff of a panel established under paragraph (1)

"(I) shall not disclose to any person or government official any identifying information about any specific child protection case with respect to which the panel is provided information; and (II) shall not make public other information unless authorized by State statute."

If a federal statute requires particular records to be closed and the state is clearly subject to the provisions of the statute, then pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution,8 the state must keep the records confidential.9 The above provisions clearly prohibit a citizen review panel from revealing any identifying information it receives regarding a specific child protection case and thus would appear to prohibit the release of identifying information received by the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee when carrying out its responsibilities under CAPTA. The federal act also provides that the citizen review panels shall not make public other information unless authorized by state statute. In light of the strong mandate of Florida's Public Records Law that records made or received by an agency in connection with official business are subject to disclosure in the absence of a statutory exemption, and the repeal of section 383.410, Florida Statutes, providing for confidentiality, it appears that state law requires the disclosure of non-identifying information.10

Moreover, the Florida Supreme Court has stated that in the absence of a statute exempting a meeting in which privileged material is discussed, the Government in the Sunshine Law, section 286.011, Florida Statutes, should be construed as containing no exceptions.11 The provisions of 42 U.S.C. 5016a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ago, (Fla. 2005).

Ago (Ago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wait v. Florida Power & Light Co.
372 So. 2d 420 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
City of Miami Beach v. Berns
245 So. 2d 38 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
State Ex Rel. Cummer v. Pace
159 So. 679 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)