Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports·Decided March 1, 2002·Published

Opinion

The Honorable J. Hal Chewning, Jr. Dixie County Property Appraiser Post Office Box 260 Cross City, Florida 32628-0260

Dear Mr. Chewning:

You have asked for my opinion on substantially the following question:

Can an individual serving on active military duty meet the residency requirements for the tax exemption for homesteads in Dixie County while serving outside the State of Florida if the service member's official home of record at the time of enlistment was in another county and the service member had no title to property in Dixie County at the time of entry into active duty?

In sum:

A military service member may meet the residency requirements for a tax exemption for homesteads in Dixie County although his or her former official home of record was in another county and the service member had no property titled in his or her name in Dixie County.

It is an elemental part of Florida tax law that, in order to qualify for the benefit of a tax exemption, the person seeking the exemption must clearly come within the requirements and scope of the law granting the exemption.1 While questionable language in taxing statutes should be resolved in favor of the taxpayer, the reverse is true in the construction of exceptions and exemptions from taxation.2 The question of residence and its permanency must be initially determined from all the facts and circumstances by the property appraiser and may not be undertaken by this office or by another entity.3

Florida's tax exemption for homesteads is provided by Article VII, section 6, Florida Constitution, and section 196.031, Florida Statutes. The constitutional provision does not establish an absolute right to a homestead exemption; rather, the exemption may be granted to an applicant only "upon establishment of right thereto in the manner prescribed by law."4 However, interpretations of the homestead exemptions under Florida law are entitled to consideration in the "liberal and beneficent spirit in which they were enacted to protect the family home."5

Section 196.031, Florida Statutes, which substantially tracks the language of and implements the constitutional provision, states:

"(1) Every person who, on January 1, has the legal title or beneficial title in equity to real property in this state and who resides thereon and in good faith makes the same his or her permanent residence, or the permanent residence of another or others legally or naturally dependent upon such person, is entitled to an exemption from all taxation, except for assessments for special benefits, up to the assessed valuation of [$25,000] on the residence and contiguous real property, as defined in s. 6, Art. VII of the State Constitution."6

Thus, based on the use of the conjunctive "and" in section 196.031(1), Florida Statutes, entitlement to Florida's homestead exemption from taxation is determined by the simultaneous existence of three factors on January 1 of the tax year: 1) possession of legal or equitable title to the property, and 2) residence on the property, and 3) the intention of the taxpayer to make the property his or her permanent residence.7

Considering the constitutional provision and the statute, this office concluded in Attorney General's Opinion 79-50 that "[i]t is necessary for all persons, including military personnel, who own real property, or those persons who are legally or naturally dependent upon such owners, to occupy the real property as a permanent home or place of residence in order for the owner thereof to be entitled to the constitutional homestead exemption from taxation."8 As the opinion notes, the language of Article VII, section 6, Florida Constitution, makes occupancy essential to the establishment of a homestead and entitlement to a homestead tax exemption.

However, the courts have noted that mere physical presence on the property is not determinative in resolving entitlement to a homestead exemption. In Crain v. Putnam,9 the Fourth District Court of Appeal reviewed the denial of a homestead exemption because the property owner, who had not lived in her home since 1992, had been placed in a nursing home in a vegetative state.

In that case the property owner had been involuntarily taken from her homestead to the hospital and, because of her physical and mental condition, could not have communicated any intention regarding her residence. She remained hospitalized in a vegetative state. Her furniture, clothing and most of her other possessions remained in the residence, and her mail was delivered there. The appellate court recognized that all the evidence considered together indicated the intent that the home was the residence of the property owner and held that her physical presence on the property was not a requirement for the exemption.

Further, the language of section 196.031(1), Florida Statutes, recognizes that the owner of property may claim a homestead exemption without the necessity of physical presence on the property. The statute provides that if the property is "the permanent residence of another or others legally or naturally dependent upon such person[,]" the property owner may be eligible for a homestead tax exemption without regard to whether the property owner resides on the property.

With regard to military personnel, the statutes contain specific language acknowledging that physical presence is not essential to a determination of permanent residence. Section 196.061, Florida Statutes, generally makes the rental of homestead property to another an abandonment of such property for homestead tax exemption purposes. However the statute contains this exception: "The provisions of this section shall not apply to a member of the Armed Forces of the United States whose service in such forces is the result of a mandatory obligation imposed by the federal Selective Service Act or who volunteers for service as a member of the Armed Forces of the United States." Thus, service personnel who are called to active duty and rent their homestead property to another may continue to qualify for and receive a homestead tax exemption on such property under the terms of this statute. Clearly, actual physical presence on homestead property is not determinative in resolving entitlement to a homestead exemption for military personnel.

Pursuant to section 196.015, Florida Statutes, intention to establish a permanent residence in this state is a factual determination that is initially made by the property appraiser. This statute provides that although no one factor is conclusive of the establishment of permanent residence, a number of relevant factors that may be considered by the property appraiser are relevant in making this determination:

"(1) Formal declarations of the applicant. (2) Informal statements of the applicant. (3) The place of employment of the applicant. (4) The previous permanent residency by the applicant in a state other than Florida or in another country and the date non-Florida residency was terminated. (5) The place where the applicant is registered to vote. (6) The place of issuance of a driver's license to the applicant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ago, (Fla. 2002).

Ago (Ago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Skuro
467 So. 2d 1098 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Horne v. Markham
288 So. 2d 196 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
State Ex Rel. Wedgworth Farms, Inc. v. Thompson
101 So. 2d 381 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Cain v. Cain
549 So. 2d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
United States Gypsum Company v. Green
110 So. 2d 409 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
Green v. Pederson
99 So. 2d 292 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Straughn v. Camp
293 So. 2d 689 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
In Re Estate of Skuro
487 So. 2d 1065 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Lake Garfield Nurseries Co. v. White
149 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Crain v. Putnam
687 So. 2d 1325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)