Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports·Decided January 29, 1982·Published

Opinion

The Honorable David H. Pingree Secretary Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301

Dear Secretary Pingree:

This is in response to your request for an opinion on substantially the following question:

ARE THE MANDATORY FUNDING REQUIREMENTS OF s 394.76, F.S., APPLICABLE TO SERVICES AND PROGRAMS PROVIDED UNDER CH. 396, `THE COMPREHENSIVE ALCOHOLISM PREVENTION, CONTROL AND TREATMENT ACT'?

The legislative findings and declaration of purpose for enactment of Ch. 396, F.S., the `Comprehensive Alcoholism Prevention, Control and Treatment Act,' is expressed in s 396.022, F.S. Pursuant to s 396.022(2), F.S., programs for the prevention, treatment and control of alcoholism should be based in the community, provide a comprehensive range of services and `. . . beintegrated with, and involve, the active participation of a wide range of public and nongovernmental agencies, especially communitymental health programs.' (e.s.) The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services is required by s 396.042(1), F.S., to formulate and effect a plan for the prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of alcoholics. In developing and setting this plan into effect, the department must `[p]rovide services throughexisting mental health centers, clinics, and other appropriate treatment resources.' (e.s.) Section 396.042(2)(b), F.S. A `treatment resource,' as defined in Ch. 396, F.S., is any private or public facility, service or program providing treatment or rehabilitation for alcoholics. Section 396.032(4), F.S. Included in the definition of `treatment resource' are community mental health centers, clinics or programs. Section 396.032(4), F.S. The department is mandated to `(d)evelop, encourage, and foster statewide, regional, and local plans and programs in the field of alcoholism, which, whenever possible, will be carried out throughthe services and programs provided under the Community MentalHealth Act, part IV of chapter 394.' (e.s.) Section 396.042(2)(g), F.S. Section 396.052(1), F.S., requires the department, to the fullest extent possible, to `. . . utilize the facilities, and coordinate its programs with the programs, of community mental health centers presently existing or hereafter to be established.' Alcoholism treatment services and facilities within the purview of s 396.052, F.S., include: emergency medical-social services and facilities; outpatient facilities (including community mental health centers); intermediate care services (including community mental health centers); and inpatient short term or extended care facilities (including community mental health centers). Section 396.052(1), F.S.

The funding and fiscal management of programs developed under Ch. 396, F.S., are controlled by Rule 10E-3.42(3)(a), F.A.C., which provides that `[r]ules and practices pertaining to funding and fiscal management shall conform to those set forth in the Florida Administrative Code, 10E-4.09(3), 10E-4.12.' These administrative code provisions regulate Community Mental Health Services programs. Rule 10E-4.12, F.A.C., provides specific information to determine the state's share of financial participation and the share of the local governing body within the uniform formula described in s 394.76(4), F.S. The specific provision of s 396.042(2)(g), F.S., requires that state and local alcoholism programs be provided through the services and programs provided under the Community Mental Health Act. `[A]ll community-based, state-aided mental health and alcoholism prevention, treatment, and control programs,' are funded pursuant to s 394.76, F.S., and Rules 10E-4.09(3) and 10E-4.12, F.A.C. Pursuant to principles of construction regarding validly promulgated administrative rules, these rules have the force and effect of law until judicially determined otherwise. See, Florida Livestock Board v. Gladden,76 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1954); In re Briley's Estate, 155 Fla. 798,21 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1945); AGO 076-185.

The Community Mental Health Act, Ch. 394, Part IV, F.S., declares the intent of the Legislature to, inter alia, organize and finance community mental health services in communities throughout the state through locally administered and controlled community mental health programs; integrate state-operated and community mental health programs into a unified mental health system; establish a uniform ratio of state government responsibility and local participation in financing mental health services and include community mental health care as a component of the integrated delivery system required to be developed by the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. Section 394.65(1), (3), (5), (8), F.S. Mental health boards are established, as provided in s 394.70, F.S., to coordinate mental health services within department service districts or subdistricts as set forth in s20.19, F.S. The mental health boards are required to prepare district mental health plans which reflect the program priorities established by the department and the needs of the district and include a list of the mental health services and service providers which will receive state and county funds. Section 394.75(1)(a), F.S. A portion of the plan shall provide for `. . . the fullest possible and most appropriate participation by existing programs . . . alcoholism programs . . . and all other public and private agencies and personnel which are required to, or may agree to, participate in the plan.' (e.s.) Section 394.75(2)(c)4., F.S. The plan may include but is not limited to, the establishment of: inpatient services; outpatient services; partial hospitalization services; emergency services; consultation and education services; and diagnostic services. Section 394.75(3)(a-f), F.S. It is the duty of each mental health board to receive and disburse such funds as are entrusted to it by law or otherwise, including funds from both private and public sources. Section 394.71(2), F.S. In addition to the duties set forth in Ch. 394, Part IV, F.S., the district mental health boards are responsible for accepting all state funds in accordance with the district mental health plan. Rule 10E-4.09(3)(a) and (b), F.A.C. See also, Rule 10E-4.09(3)(d)c., F.A.C., which states that the district mental health board must conduct program planning and evaluation functions in the areas of alcoholism, mental health and other special programs, and Rule 10E-4.09(4) which describes the administrative functions of the district mental health board as including `. . . any other duties that maybe necessary to carry out the intentions of the Community Mental Health Services Act, . . . and the Comprehensive Alcoholism Prevention, Control, and Treatment Act. . . .'

The financing of community mental health services and programs is based upon a uniform ratio reflecting both state government responsibility and local participation in financing mental health services. Section 394.66(5), F.S. The state portion of financial participation is seventy-five percent of the total operating cost less the following: nonreimbursable expenses pursuant to s394.76(7), F.S.; federal grants, excluding Title IVA and VI funds of the Social Security Act; and inpatient and third-party payments for which reimbursement is sought from the state. Section394.76(4)(a) 1-3, F.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ago, (Fla. 1982).

Ago (Ago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Livestock Board v. Gladden
76 So. 2d 291 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Ferguson v. State
377 So. 2d 709 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Singleton v. Larson
46 So. 2d 186 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)
Sandegren v. STATE, ETC.
397 So. 2d 657 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
State v. Williams
343 So. 2d 35 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Johnson v. State
336 So. 2d 93 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
American Bakeries Co. v. City of Haines City
180 So. 524 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Estate of Briley v. Briley
21 So. 2d 595 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)
Paskind v. State ex rel. Salcines
390 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)