Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports·Decided February 5, 1979·Published

Opinion

Guy H. Amason, Jr. Attorney for Iona-McGregor Fire Protection and Rescue Service District

Harry Schooley Lee County Property Appraiser Ft. Myers

QUESTIONS:

1. Is the property appraiser, at the expense of his office, required to furnish to the governing board of the Iona-McGregor Fire District a special assessment roll assessing each parcel of real property within the district under the provisions of Ch. 75-421, Laws of Florida, as amended by Ch. 76-402, Laws of Florida?

2. Is the district obliged to pay and is the property appraiser entitled to be paid for services that he is authorized and required to provide the district by the terms of Chs. 75-421 and 76-402, Laws of Florida?

SUMMARY:

Chapter 75-421, Laws of Florida, as amended by Ch. 76-402, imposes upon the board of commissioners of the Iona-McGregor Fire Protection and Rescue Service District the duty and responsibility as well as the expense of preparing the special assessment roll for the district. Such acts impose upon the Lee County Property Appraiser both the duty of furnishing that part of the county real property assessment roll, or county tax roll, as lists all taxable real property situate within the boundaries of the district and the duty of entering and extending the assessments made by the district's governing board on the county tax roll. The compensation to the property appraiser for the performance of such duties is that provided in Ch. 76-402, which method of compensation or reimbursement is substantially the same as that provided in s. 192.091(1), F. S.

AS TO QUESTION 1:

While these statutes are not models of clarity and the terminology thereof is somewhat ambiguous, upon examination of the whole of Ch. 75-421, Laws of Florida, as amended by Ch. 76-402, Laws of Florida, I am led to the conclusion that the Legislature did not intend, not in terms mandate, that the county property appraiser prepare at his expense and provide without charge to the governing board of the district a special assessment roll assessing each parcel of taxable real property within the district. No provision of the subject statutes empowers the district or its governing board to levy ad valorem taxes; nor is any excise or license tax, which must be authorized by general law, involved. See s. 9, Art. VII, State Const. Section 5(1) of Ch. 75-421 expressly and specifically empowers the district's governing board `to levy special assessments against the taxable real estate within the district to provide funds for the purpose of this district.' The rate of such special assessments `shall be fixed by a resolution of the board as provided in this subsection,' though the maximum rates of assessment are fixed by the Legislature. See s. 5(2), Ch. 75-421. In `making assessment rolls' the governing board of the district is required to consider `size of property, fire hazard, and protection provided.' See s. 5(3), Ch. 75-421. While the making of special assessments is an exercise of the taxing power, such local assessments are not ad valorem or property taxes and are governed by entirely different principles of law. See 29A Fla. Jur. Special Assessments ss. 3, 5, and 6. Cf. Naples v. Moon,269 So.2d 355 (Fla. 1972). The power to levy or make such local or special assessments, or to `assess such assessments' as characterized by s. 6(3) of Ch. 75-421, is not vested by law in the property appraiser. All things having to do with the making of such assessments and the fixing of the rates thereof must be done by the governing board of the district in accordance with the method prescribed by the Legislature in the district's enabling acts.

Section 6(1) of Ch. 75-421 does require the property appraiser to `furnish the commissioners [board of commissioners of the district] a tax roll covering all taxable properties within the district . . . each year.' This `tax roll' obviously is not the `assessment roll' to be made by the `commissioners' referred to in s. 5(3) of Ch. 75-421. Cf. ss. 170.06 and 170.16, F. S., as to the making and contents of certain municipal special assessment rolls and their efficacy to evidence the validity of such special assessments and assessment proceedings. Nor is the tax roll composed of the `assessments made by the board' which the property appraiser is required by s. 6(2) of Ch. 75-421 to `include in the Lee County Tax roll,' or the `special assessments levied and assessed by the district' referred to in s. 7 of Ch. 75-421 which are made a lien upon `the land so assessed along with the county taxes assessed against wuch land . . . until paid.' The `tax roll' referred to in s. 6(1) of Ch. 75-421, is simply so much of the county real property assessment roll (see ss. 193.085, 193.114, and 193.116, F. S.) as lists all of the taxable real property situate within the boundaries of the district. For the purposes of Ch. 75-421, the tax roll is a list of all the real property located in the district which is subject to ad valorem taxation by the statutorily authorized taxing authorities within the county, or any of them, and which will be subject to the levy by the governing board of the district of the `special assessments against the taxable real estate within the district' as the `rate of assessments' fixed by resolution of such board, all as provided in s. 5 of Ch. 75-421. In any event, it is in no sense an assessment roll in the context of special or local assessments and the rules of law governing the making of special assessments or the preparation and efficacy of such assessment rolls. The assessment rolls and the special assessments provided for in Ch. 75-421 are required by the express terms thereof to be made and prepared by the governing board of the district. The property appraiser is not charged by the enabling statute with any duty or responsibility in those regards, and, indeed, the statute does not delegate or grant any authority to the property appraiser to exercise any such powers or to perform such functions. The property appraiser is required, however, to include or enter and extend on the county real property assessment roll (or the county tax roll as it is characterized or referred to following certification by the appraiser) `the assessments made by the board (of commissioners of the district),' i.e. the special assessments levied and assessed by the district, which are collected by the county tax collector along with the county taxes as provided in Ch. 75-421 and enforced as provided by general law for the enforcement of delinquent county taxes.

AS TO QUESTION 2:

Section 6(3) of Ch. 75-421, before its amendment by Ch. 76-402, provided that the property appraiser `shall receive a commission or fee for assessing such assessments of 3 percent . . . insteadof the same commissions or fees usually provided for theassessment . . . of county taxes.' (Emphasis supplied.) The phrase `assessing such assessments,' obviously has reference to `the assessments made by the board' in s. 6(2) of Ch. 75-421 which, by the terms thereof, the property appraiser is required to include in or enter and extend on the county tax roll. Section 6(3) of Ch. 75-421 did not in express terms provide for any commission to the property appraiser for `furnish(ing) the commissioners a tax roll covering all taxable properties within the district.' The statute not having authorized or required any distinct and separate compensation to the appraiser for such services, the rendition of this particular service is deemed to be gratuitous. Gavagan v. Marshall,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ago, (Fla. 1979).

Ago (Ago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Naples v. Moon
269 So. 2d 355 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
State of Florida v. Sullivan
116 So. 255 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
American Bakeries Co. v. City of Haines City
180 So. 524 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
State Ex Rel. Landis v. Reardon
154 So. 868 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Haworth v. Chapman
152 So. 663 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Beebe v. Richardson
23 So. 2d 718 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)
Gavagan v. Marshall
33 So. 2d 862 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)