Aerojet-general Corp. v. Machine Tool Works, Oerlikon-Buehrle Ltd.
886 F.2d 1310
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 5, 1989·No. No. 88-1351·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Having considered in banc the jurisdictional question set forth in this court’s Order of May 23, 1989, the court has determined that it does have subject matter jurisdiction and that an opinion explaining the basis for that determination will issue in due course.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
(1) In view of settlement negotiations the joint motion to stay a decision on the merits and other jurisdictional issues is granted.
(2) The parties will notify the Clerk of the status of settlement negotiations on 1 November 1989, 1 December 1989, and, if necessary, 1 January 1990.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aerojet-general Corp. v. Machine Tool Works, Oerlikon-Buehrle Ltd., 886 F.2d 1310 (Fed. Cir. 1989).
886 F.2d 1310 (Aerojet-general Corp. v. Machine Tool Works, Oerlikon-Buehrle Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aerojet-General Corp. v. MacHine Tool Works, Oerlikon-Buehrle Ltd.
886 F.2d 1310 (Federal Circuit, 1989)