Adrian Heath v. State
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00293-CR ____________________
ADRIAN HEATH, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 12-03-02580 CR ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 15, 2013, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not
apparent from the notice of appeal and the appeal would be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the
appeal. No response has been filed.
The notice of appeal seeks to appeal the denial of a motion to recuse. The
order is not appealable prior to conviction. See Green v. State, 374 S.W.3d 434,
1 445-46 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012); Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1991). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice
Opinion Delivered September 4, 2013 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adrian Heath v. State (Adrian Heath v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.