Adlington v. Florida Department of Corrections

954 So. 2d 43, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3634, 2007 WL 715010
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 2007·No. No. 1D06-5454·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to our order of November 8, 2006, we have determined that the Order Striking Motion for Rehearing is not an appeal-able order. Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(4); Lewis v. State, 928 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

BROWNING, C.J., WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adlington v. Florida Department of Corrections, 954 So. 2d 43, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3634, 2007 WL 715010 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

954 So. 2d 43 (Adlington v. Florida Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Landmark Towers, LLC v. Ibarguen
954 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)