Adlington v. Florida Department of Corrections
This text of 954 So. 2d 42 (Adlington v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Phillip ADLINGTON, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Phillip Adlington, pro se, Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General; Kathleen Von Hoene, General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellant's response to our order of December 18, 2006, we have determined that the Order Striking Motion for Rehearing is not an appealable order. Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(4); Lewis v. State, 928 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st *43 DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
BROWNING, C.J., WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
954 So. 2d 42, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3639, 2007 WL 714599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adlington-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2007.