Adlington v. Florida Department of Corrections

954 So. 2d 42, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3639, 2007 WL 714599
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 2007
Docket1D06-5452
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 954 So. 2d 42 (Adlington v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adlington v. Florida Department of Corrections, 954 So. 2d 42, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3639, 2007 WL 714599 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

954 So.2d 42 (2007)

Phillip ADLINGTON, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D06-5452.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 12, 2007.
Rehearing Denied April 20, 2007.

Phillip Adlington, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General; Kathleen Von Hoene, General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant's response to our order of December 18, 2006, we have determined that the Order Striking Motion for Rehearing is not an appealable order. Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(4); Lewis v. State, 928 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st *43 DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

BROWNING, C.J., WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. McNeil
983 So. 2d 660 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
954 So. 2d 42, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3639, 2007 WL 714599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adlington-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2007.