Adlersheim v. Salzman

234 A.D. 840

This text of 234 A.D. 840 (Adlersheim v. Salzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adlersheim v. Salzman, 234 A.D. 840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

It may not be said that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The verdict, however, was clearly against the weight of the evidence. Therefore, the judgment is reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Present ■— Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adlersheim-v-salzman-nyappdiv-1931.