Adlersheim v. Salzman

241 A.D. 849

Opinions

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Finch, P. J., O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ., concur (memorandum by Untermyer, J., stating ground for concurring in affirmance); Merrell and Martin, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and dismiss the complaint; dissenting opinion by Martin, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adlersheim v. Salzman, 241 A.D. 849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 849 (Adlersheim v. Salzman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilsenbeck v. . Guhring
30 N.E. 580 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Rohrbacher v. . Gillig
96 N.E. 733 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Hudson v. Church of the Holy Trinity
166 N.E. 306 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Silverman v. Ulrika Realty Corp.
239 A.D. 194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)