Adkins v. Decoco

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6428

MICHAEL ADKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR DECOCO, Doctor of Psychiatry; DOCTOR HARRIS, Doctor of Psychologist; DOCTOR BOND, Doctor of Psychologist,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-05-118-2)

Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 30, 2005

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael Adkins appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Adkins v. Decoco, No. CA-05-118-2 (E.D. Va. filed

March 17, 2005 & entered March 21, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -