Adkins v. Decoco
This text of Adkins v. Decoco (Adkins v. Decoco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6428
MICHAEL ADKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR DECOCO, Doctor of Psychiatry; DOCTOR HARRIS, Doctor of Psychologist; DOCTOR BOND, Doctor of Psychologist,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-05-118-2)
Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 30, 2005
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Michael Adkins appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Adkins v. Decoco, No. CA-05-118-2 (E.D. Va. filed
March 17, 2005 & entered March 21, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adkins v. Decoco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-decoco-ca4-2005.