Adirondack Park Agency v. Ton-Da-Lay Associates

386 N.E.2d 1089, 46 N.Y.2d 832, 414 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2498
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adirondack Park Agency v. Ton-Da-Lay Associates. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 N.Y.2d 834
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 1978·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it renews a decided motion for leave to appeal, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, and, insofar as it may be considered as seeking reargument of the [833]*833decided motion for leave to appeal, dismissed as untimely, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. [See 45 NY2d 834.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adirondack Park Agency v. Ton-Da-Lay Associates, 386 N.E.2d 1089, 46 N.Y.2d 832, 414 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2498 (N.Y. 1978).

386 N.E.2d 1089 (Adirondack Park Agency v. Ton-Da-Lay Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.