Adirondack Park Agency v. Ton-Da-Lay Associates
381 N.E.2d 612, 45 N.Y.2d 834, 409 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2259
This text of 381 N.E.2d 612 (Adirondack Park Agency v. Ton-Da-Lay Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adirondack Park Agency v. Ton-Da-Lay Associates, 381 N.E.2d 612, 45 N.Y.2d 834, 409 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2259 (N.Y. 1978).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the nonfinal order sought to be appealed from was entered in an action, not a proceeding, and therefore is not one which comes within the provisions of CPLR 5602 (subd [a], par 2). [835]*835(See, e.g., Herman Constr. Co. v State Univ. Constr. Fund, 41 NY2d 943.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Triboro Coach Corp. v. State
88 A.D.2d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
381 N.E.2d 612, 45 N.Y.2d 834, 409 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adirondack-park-agency-v-ton-da-lay-associates-ny-1978.