Adirondack Park Agency v. Ton-Da-Lay Associates
381 N.E.2d 612, 45 N.Y.2d 834, 409 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2259
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the nonfinal order sought to be appealed from was entered in an action, not a proceeding, and therefore is not one which comes within the provisions of CPLR 5602 (subd [a], par 2). [835]*835(See, e.g., Herman Constr. Co. v State Univ. Constr. Fund, 41 NY2d 943.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adirondack Park Agency v. Ton-Da-Lay Associates, 381 N.E.2d 612, 45 N.Y.2d 834, 409 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2259 (N.Y. 1978).
381 N.E.2d 612 (Adirondack Park Agency v. Ton-Da-Lay Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Triboro Coach Corp. v. State
88 A.D.2d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)