Adelman v. Lower Minnesota River Watershed District

382 U.S. 108, 86 S. Ct. 257, 15 L. Ed. 2d 192, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 270
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 15, 1965·No. 512·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adelman v. Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, 382 U.S. 108, 86 S. Ct. 257, 15 L. Ed. 2d 192, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 270 (1965).

382 U.S. 108 (Adelman v. Lower Minnesota River Watershed District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pike v. Gunyou
488 N.W.2d 298 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1992)
TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. v. Loft Homes, Inc.
439 N.W.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1989)
Hudson v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.
609 F. Supp. 467 (N.D. California, 1985)
Hamilton, Miller, Hudson & Fayne Travel Corp. v. Hori
520 F. Supp. 67 (E.D. Michigan, 1981)
Markwardt v. State, Water Resources Board
254 N.W.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1977)
Pinebrook v. Pinebrook
329 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Milton Margoles, M.D. v. Alida Johns
483 F.2d 1212 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Overseas National Airways, Inc. v. Saloom
52 Pa. D. & C.2d 22 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Tate v. Renault, Inc.
278 F. Supp. 457 (E.D. Tennessee, 1967)
Stuart v. Burford
264 F. Supp. 191 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1967)
Snow v. Clark
263 F. Supp. 66 (W.D. Virginia, 1967)
J. W. Sparks & Co. v. Gallos
220 A.2d 673 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1966)