Adderley v. Tight

121 So. 2d 806, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2286
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 1960·No. No. 1621·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this cause is from the “order, judgment or decree * * * directing verdict for defendant, Joseph H. Moorhead on same date and recorded as Entry No. 42 recorded in Circuit Court Minute Book 67 at page 258.” However, it appears that Entry No. 42 is the verdict of the jury. After studying the record presented to us, we are unable to find any order or judgment from which appeal will lie under the provisions of Rule 3.2, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A., and accordingly, the appeal is dismissed sua sponte. See Chastain v. Embry, Fla.App. 1960, 118 So.2d 33; Schutzer v. City of Miami, Fla.App.1958, 99 So.2d 729; Bagdad Land & Lumber Co. v. Boyette, 1931, 104 Fla. 696, 138 So. 382.

Dismissed.

ALLEN, C. J., and KANNER and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adderley v. Tight, 121 So. 2d 806, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2286 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).

121 So. 2d 806 (Adderley v. Tight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chastain v. Embry
118 So. 2d 33 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Bagdad Land & Lumber Co. v. Boyette
138 So. 382 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Schutzer v. City of Miami
99 So. 2d 729 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)