Adderley v. Tight

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Adderley v. Tight

121 So. 2d 806, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2286

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 1960

DocketNo. 1621

StatusPublished

This text of 121 So. 2d 806 (Adderley v. Tight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adderley v. Tight, 121 So. 2d 806, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2286 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this cause is from the “order, judgment or decree * * * directing verdict for defendant, Joseph H. Moorhead on same date and recorded as Entry No. 42 recorded in Circuit Court Minute Book 67 at page 258.” However, it appears that Entry No. 42 is the verdict of the jury. After studying the record presented to us, we are unable to find any order or judgment from which appeal will lie under the provisions of Rule 3.2, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A., and accordingly, the appeal is dismissed sua sponte. See Chastain v. Embry, Fla.App. 1960, 118 So.2d 33; Schutzer v. City of Miami, Fla.App.1958, 99 So.2d 729; Bagdad Land & Lumber Co. v. Boyette, 1931, 104 Fla. 696, 138 So. 382.

Dismissed.

ALLEN, C. J., and KANNER and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this cause is from the “order, judgment or decree * * * directing verdict for defendant, Joseph H. Moorhead on same date and recorded as Entry No. 42 recorded in Circuit Court Minute Book 67 at page 258.” However, it appears that Entry No. 42 is the verdict of the jury. After studying the record presented to us, we are unable to find any order or judgment from which appeal will lie under the provisions of Rule 3.2, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A., and accordingly, the appeal is dismissed sua sponte. See Chastain v. Embry, Fla.App. 1960, 118 So.2d 33; Schutzer v. City of Miami, Fla.App.1958, 99 So.2d 729; Bagdad Land & Lumber Co. v. Boyette, 1931, 104 Fla. 696, 138 So. 382.

Dismissed.

ALLEN, C. J., and KANNER and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 So. 2d 806, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adderley-v-tight-fladistctapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack