Schutzer v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schutzer v. City of Miami

99 So. 2d 729

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 16, 1958

DocketNo. 57-343

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 99 So. 2d 729 (Schutzer v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schutzer v. City of Miami, 99 So. 2d 729 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

HORTON, Judge.

The appeal in this cause is from a “final judgment” dated February 4, 1957, the material portion of which is as follows:

“Ordered and adjudged that the Defendant’s Motion for Directed Verdict be hereby granted.”

Although the appellee has not raised the question, the court sua sponte has determined that the “final judgment” sought to be reviewed is not a final decision from which appeal would lie under the provisions of Rule 3.2(b), Florida Appellate Rules. Until a final judgment is rendered that is subject to appeal pursuant to the aforementioned rule, there is nothing for this court to review. See Brannon v. Johnston, Fla. 1955, 83 So.2d 779. The appeal accordingly is dismissed.

Dismissed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and DREW E. HARRIS, A. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI