Adaptive Maritime Expertise Inc. v. State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

S.D. Florida

Adaptive Maritime Expertise Inc. v. State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

District Court, S.D. Florida·Decided June 6, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-14094·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION Case Number: 25-14094-CIV-MARTINEZ-MAYNARD ADAPTIVE MARITIME EXPERTISE, INC., Plaintiff,

STATE OF FLORIDA FISH & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION, Defendant. / ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Honorable Shaniek M. Maynard, United States Magistrate Judge, Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on Plaintiff's pro se Complaint for “violation of Constitutional rights, police negligence, and unconstitutional proceedings under Florida Statutes” relating to a vessel owned by Plaintiff that is “predominantly aground.” (ECF Nos. 1, 6.) Judge Maynard recommends in the R&R that Plaintiff's Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with Court Order, and failure to state a valid claim. (ECF No. 6.) The Court has reviewed the entire file and record, and notes that no objections have been filed to the R&R. Failure to file objections timely shall bar the parties from a de novo determination by the District Judge of an issue covered in the R&R and shall bar the parties from attacking on appeal unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions contained in the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); Henley v. Johnson, 885 F.2d 790, 794 (11th Cir. 1989); 11th Cir. R. 3-1 (2016). Accordingly, after careful consideration, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Judge Maynard’s R&R, (ECF No. 6), is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff's Complaint, (ECF No. 1), is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with Court Order, and failure to state a valid claim. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case and DENY all pending motions as MOOT. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this day of June, 2025.

JOSE MARTINEZ } UNITED STATES DISTRICT GE Copies provided to: Magistrate Judge Maynard Gunnar Christian Beswick, pro se All Counsel of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION Case Number: 25-14094-CIV-MARTINEZ-MAYNARD ADAPTIVE MARITIME EXPERTISE, INC., Plaintiff,

STATE OF FLORIDA FISH & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION, Defendant. / ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Honorable Shaniek M. Maynard, United States Magistrate Judge, Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on Plaintiff's pro se Complaint for “violation of Constitutional rights, police negligence, and unconstitutional proceedings under Florida Statutes” relating to a vessel owned by Plaintiff that is “predominantly aground.” (ECF Nos. 1, 6.) Judge Maynard recommends in the R&R that Plaintiff's Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with Court Order, and failure to state a valid claim. (ECF No. 6.) The Court has reviewed the entire file and record, and notes that no objections have been filed to the R&R. Failure to file objections timely shall bar the parties from a de novo determination by the District Judge of an issue covered in the R&R and shall bar the parties from attacking on appeal unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions contained in the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); Henley v. Johnson, 885 F.2d 790, 794 (11th Cir. 1989); 11th Cir. R. 3-1 (2016). Accordingly, after careful consideration, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Judge Maynard’s R&R, (ECF No. 6), is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff's Complaint, (ECF No. 1), is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with Court Order, and failure to state a valid claim. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case and DENY all pending motions as MOOT. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this day of June, 2025.

JOSE MARTINEZ } UNITED STATES DISTRICT GE Copies provided to: Magistrate Judge Maynard Gunnar Christian Beswick, pro se All Counsel of Record

Adaptive Maritime Expertise Inc. v. State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, (S.D. Fla. 2025).

Pincite

Adaptive Maritime Expertise Inc. v. State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (Adaptive Maritime Expertise Inc. v. State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related