Adanuncio v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adanuncio v. City of New York

281 A.D. 763, 118 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3212

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 763 (Adanuncio v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adanuncio v. City of New York, 281 A.D. 763, 118 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3212 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

— -Appeal from an order denying a motion on behalf of an infant and his father for leave to tile a late notice of claim under section 50-e, of the General Municipal Law. The infant was fifteen years of age at the time of the happening of the accident, and the application was made approximately seven months after the accident. Failure to serve the notice in time was not by reason of infancy or other disability recognized by the statute. Order affirmed, without costs. (Matter of Nori v. City of Yonkers, 274 App. Div. 545, affd. 300 N. Y. 632; Matter of Lustig v. City of New York, 278 App. Div. 716.) Eolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Y/enzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur. [200 Misc. 676.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— -Appeal from an order denying a motion on behalf of an infant and his father for leave to tile a late notice of claim under section 50-e, of the General Municipal Law. The infant was fifteen years of age at the time of the happening of the accident, and the application was made approximately seven months after the accident. Failure to serve the notice in time was not by reason of infancy or other disability recognized by the statute. Order affirmed, without costs. (Matter of Nori v. City of Yonkers, 274 App. Div. 545, affd. 300 N. Y. 632; Matter of Lustig v. City of New York, 278 App. Div. 716.) Eolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Y/enzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur. [200 Misc. 676.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 763, 118 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adanuncio-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack