Adams v. The People of the State of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 25, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-04543·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DIMETREUS ADAMS, Plaintiff, 24-CV-4543 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated November 26, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit an amended application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) or pay the $405.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended IFP application or paid the fees.1 Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

1 On January 17, 2025, the Court mailed a copy of the order to the most recent address Plaintiff provided, but it was returned as undeliverable on February 6, 2025. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment dismissing this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 25, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. The People of the State of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Adams v. The People of the State of New York (Adams v. The People of the State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)