Adams v. State
This text of 639 S.W.2d 942 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant was convicted of the offense of possession of methamphetamine, and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for four years. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and remanded the cause to the trial court for entry of a judgment of acquittal. Adams v. State, (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1982).
We find the reasons for review advanced by the State to be without merit, with one exception. The Court of Appeals erred in directing that a judgment of acquittal be entered in this case. The admission of the unlawfully seized evidence was trial error, and the proper remedy is to reverse the conviction and remand the cause for a new trial. Collins v. State, 602 S.W.2d 537 (Tex.Cr.App.1980).
The State’s petition for discretionary review is granted, and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
639 S.W.2d 942, 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-texcrimapp-1982.