Adams v. State

15 Okla. Crim. 684
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 11, 1919
DocketNo. A-3045; No. A-3046; No. A-3047; No. A-3048
StatusPublished

This text of 15 Okla. Crim. 684 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. State, 15 Okla. Crim. 684 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeals in the above entitled and numbered oases are from judgments of the district court of .Payne county, rendered in accordance with the verdicts returned by the jury in each of said causes. The information in each case charged the defendant with keeping a place in the town of Yale, Payne county, with the intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors.

In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute (see. 4, ch. 26, Session Laws 1913) upon which these prosecutions were based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgments appealed from are reversea.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Okla. Crim. 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.