Adams v. State

70 S.W.3d 457, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 922, 2000 WL 760314
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1561
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 2000·No. No. ED 76815·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from a judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 70 S.W.3d 457, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 922, 2000 WL 760314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

70 S.W.3d 457 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.