Adams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Adams v. State

30 S.W.3d 844, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1378, 2000 WL 1371302

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 19, 2000·No. No. ED 77243·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward Adams (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s denial without an evidentiary-hearing of his Rule 24.035¹ motion to vacate his conviction of robbery, armed criminal action, and resisting arrest for which he was sentenced to concurrent sentences of fifteen years. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward Adams (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s denial without an evidentiary-hearing of his Rule 24.035¹ motion to vacate his conviction of robbery, armed criminal action, and resisting arrest for which he was sentenced to concurrent sentences of fifteen years. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Adams v. State, 30 S.W.3d 844, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1378, 2000 WL 1371302 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

30 S.W.3d 844 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.