Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Adams v. State

Adams v. State

884 So. 2d 1076, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15161, 2004 WL 2309072
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 800 So. 2d 741 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 2004·No. No. 2D04-1819·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Donald W. Adams appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the denial of the issues raised by Adams without discussion. Although we requested supplemental briefing regarding a potential issue relating to the charging document, we conclude that any such issue must first be addressed by the trial court. Therefore, we affirm without prejudice to any right Adams may have to file a timely, legally sufficient postconviction motion in the trial court. See Whitehead v. State, 884 So.2d 139 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and VILLANTI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 884 So. 2d 1076, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15161, 2004 WL 2309072 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

884 So. 2d 1076 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitehead v. State
884 So. 2d 139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)