Adams v. State

878 So. 2d 400, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8090, 2004 WL 1252767
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 2004·No. No. 3D03-859·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rodriguez v. State, 826 So.2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), further explained on denial of rehearing, 837 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Delsol v. State, 837 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); and Woody v. State, 847 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Bynes v. State, 854 So.2d 289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 878 So. 2d 400, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8090, 2004 WL 1252767 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

878 So. 2d 400 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. State
909 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)