Adams v. State

866 So. 2d 1290, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3323, 2004 WL 433974
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 800 So. 2d 741
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 2004·No. No. 4D03-4168·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cardell Adams appeals the summary denial of his post-conviction motion. In ground one, Adams alleged that his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance by not investigating or calling a witness who would have provided favorable testimony. In response, the state argued the motion was untimely. The state did not address the merits and the attached records do not refute this claim. However, the motion was timely filed within two years after the conviction and sentence became final on direct appeal. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or for attachment of portions of the record that conclusively demonstrate appellant is entitled to no relief.

FARMER, C.J., KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 866 So. 2d 1290, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3323, 2004 WL 433974 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

866 So. 2d 1290 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.