Adams v. State

790 So. 2d 442, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3451, 2000 WL 296526
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 23, 2000·No. No. 1D98-4840·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced as a prison re-leasee reoffender, and he has raised several arguments that the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act, section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997), is unconstitutional. We have previously addressed each of these challenges and found them to be without merit. See Chambers v. State, 752 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). However, we certify the same question previously certified in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla.1999).

AFFIRMED.

MINER, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 790 So. 2d 442, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3451, 2000 WL 296526 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

790 So. 2d 442 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. State
787 So. 2d 828 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)