Adams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Adams v. State

691 So. 2d 40, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3167, 1997 WL 154764

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 4, 1997

DocketNo. 97-01064

StatusPublished

This text of 691 So. 2d 40 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. State, 691 So. 2d 40, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3167, 1997 WL 154764 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Adams appeals the order striking his motion to supplement his pending motion to correct an illegal sentence. We dismiss this appeal because the order appealed is a non-appealable nonfinal order.

The record furnished indicates that Adams filed a motion to correct illegal sentence in August 1996, which we assume is still pending in the trial court. Although the trial court order clearly states Adams has thirty days to appeal the striking of his motion to [41]*41supplement, this court has been furnished no final order entered by the trial court disposing of the motion to correct an illegal sentence. By filing this appeal, Adams was complying with an erroneous trial court order.

Appeal dismissed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Adams appeals the order striking his motion to supplement his pending motion to correct an illegal sentence. We dismiss this appeal because the order appealed is a non-appealable nonfinal order.

The record furnished indicates that Adams filed a motion to correct illegal sentence in August 1996, which we assume is still pending in the trial court. Although the trial court order clearly states Adams has thirty days to appeal the striking of his motion to [41]*41supplement, this court has been furnished no final order entered by the trial court disposing of the motion to correct an illegal sentence. By filing this appeal, Adams was complying with an erroneous trial court order.

Appeal dismissed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

691 So. 2d 40, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3167, 1997 WL 154764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.