Adams v. State

759 So. 2d 742, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6537, 2000 WL 690002
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2000·No. No. 3D00-1002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Although it appears that his offenses occurred within the “window period,” see Salters v. State, 758 So.2d 667 (Fla.2000), the record affirmatively shows that the appellant was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender without regard to aggravated stalking, the qualifying offense added by chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, which was in turn invalidated by State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999). His claim that Thompson entitles him to post conviction relief is therefore without merit. See Gulley v. State, 758 So.2d 635 (Fla.2000).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 759 So. 2d 742, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6537, 2000 WL 690002 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

759 So. 2d 742 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mann v. State
825 So. 2d 1061 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)