Adams v. State
464 So. 2d 712, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12913
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 443 So. 2d 1003 →
Opinion
We reverse. In our view the evidence against the appellant was insufficient to establish anything more than a suspicion of misconduct. See Danek v. State, 429 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) and Miller v. State, 420 So.2d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. State, 464 So. 2d 712, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12913 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
464 So. 2d 712 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. State
420 So. 2d 631 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Danek v. State
429 So. 2d 1369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)