Adams v. Hinkle
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6339
WILL ADAMS, a/k/a Skip Adams-Taylor,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE HINKLE, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-108-AM)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Will Adams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Will Adams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
relief without prejudice on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §
2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2002), for failure to exhaust state court
remedies. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. Adams v. Hinkle, No. CA-02-108-AM
(E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. Hinkle (Adams v. Hinkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.