Adams v. Hinkle

Fourth Circuit

Adams v. Hinkle

42 F. App'x 598

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 31, 2002·No. No. 02-6339·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Will Adams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief without prejudice on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2002), for failure to exhaust state court remedies. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Adams v. Hinkle, No. CA-02-108-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Will Adams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief without prejudice on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2002), for failure to exhaust state court remedies. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Adams v. Hinkle, No. CA-02-108-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Adams v. Hinkle, 42 F. App'x 598 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

42 F. App'x 598 (Adams v. Hinkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related