Adams v. Helms

48 So. 290, 95 Miss. 211
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 48 So. 290 (Adams v. Helms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Helms, 48 So. 290, 95 Miss. 211 (Mich. 1909).

Opinion

Mayes, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

By section 307 of the Code of 1906, the board of supervisors is required to erect and keep in good repair, in their respective counties, a good and convenient courthouse and jail. By section 319 it is given authority to insure the courthouse and certain other property named therein, the cost of the insurance to be paid out of the county treasury. If the property authorized to be insured is destroyed by fire, money collected on the insurance contract takes the place of the property so far as creditors of the county are concerned, and does not become a part of the general county fund, to be paid out on current expenses. It is a trust fund, to be used only for the purpose of replacing the property destroyed, so long as the county stands in need of the thing so destroyed. It required no order of the board to give this effect to the fund. Indeed, no order of - the board can chang’e the character of the fund until the county has had the things replaced.

Affi/rmed.

Fletcher, J., took no part 'in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swetman v. Harrison County
42 So. 2d 801 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1949)
State Ex Rel. Diederichs v. Board of Trustees
7 P.2d 543 (Montana Supreme Court, 1932)
Marks v. Richmond County
140 S.E. 880 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
California Highway Commission v. Ballard
247 P. 527 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)
Dougan Co. v. Klamath County
193 P. 645 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 So. 290, 95 Miss. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-helms-miss-1909.