Adams v. Deaton, Inc.
696 So. 2d 997, 1997 WL 391531
Opinion
John ADAMS, et al.
v.
DEATON, INC., et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. The trial court's rulings do not represent an abuse of its broad discretion in discovery matters. See Laburre v. East Jefferson General Hosp., 555 So.2d 1381 (La. 1990). Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the judgment of the trial court reinstated. Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
*998 CALOGERO, C.J., and LEMMON, J., would deny the writ.
JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. Deaton, Inc., 696 So. 2d 997, 1997 WL 391531 (La. 1997).
696 So. 2d 997 (Adams v. Deaton, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stolzle v. Safety & Systems Assurance Consultants, Inc.
819 So. 2d 287 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2002)
Brodtmann v. Duke
803 So. 2d 41 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)
Belonga v. Crescent City Dodge, L.L.C.
781 So. 2d 1247 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2001)