Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Haw. 1
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 11, 2015·No. SCWC-12-0000741·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000741 11-MAR-2015 08:29 AM

SCWC-12-0000741

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

CHRISTIE ADAMS, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

CDM MEDIA USA, INC., Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000741; CIV. NO. 11-1-0931)

ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: Pollack, J.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court,

filed on February 24, 2015, is corrected as follows:

“perpetual” is corrected to read “pretextual” on page

16, in line 5 of the indented quotation.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this

change.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, March 11, 2015.

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc., (haw 2015).

Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc. (Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.