Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Haw. 1
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided February 6, 2014·No. SCWC-12-0000741·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000741 06-FEB-2014 12:06 PM

SCWC-12-0000741

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

CHRISTIE ADAMS, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.

CDM MEDIA USA, INC., Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000741; CIV. NO. 11-1-0931)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., Circuit Judge Alm, in place of Acoba, J., recused) Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Christie Adams’

application for writ of certiorari filed on December 23, 2013, is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 6, 2014.

Charles H. Brower /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Steven S. Alm

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc, (haw 2014).

Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc (Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.