Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 6, 2014
DocketSCWC-12-0000741
StatusPublished

This text of Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc (Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc, (haw 2014).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000741 06-FEB-2014 12:06 PM

SCWC-12-0000741 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

CHRISTIE ADAMS, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. CDM MEDIA USA, INC., Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000741; CIV. NO. 11-1-0931) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., Circuit Judge Alm, in place of Acoba, J., recused) Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Christie Adams’

application for writ of certiorari filed on December 23, 2013, is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 6, 2014.

Charles H. Brower /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Steven S. Alm

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-cdm-media-usa-inc-haw-2014.