Adams Const. Co. v. Adams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Adams Const. Co. v. Adams

49 So. 2d 138, 254 Ala. 547, 1950 Ala. LEXIS 623

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 30, 1950·No. 6 Div. 921·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

After full consideration of the record in this case we are of the opinion that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the great weight of the evidence and that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial. For this error the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

All the Justices concur except GARDNER, C. J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After full consideration of the record in this case we are of the opinion that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the great weight of the evidence and that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial. For this error the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

All the Justices concur except GARDNER, C. J., not sitting.

Adams Const. Co. v. Adams, 49 So. 2d 138, 254 Ala. 547, 1950 Ala. LEXIS 623 (Ala. 1950).

Pincite

49 So. 2d 138 (Adams Const. Co. v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related