Adair v. Varga

N.D. Illinois

Adair v. Varga

DecidedMay 27, 2022

Docket1:18-cv-06305

StatusUnknown

This text of Adair v. Varga (Adair v. Varga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adair v. Varga, (N.D. Ill. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Patrick Adair, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 18 C 6305 Vv. ) ) Hon. Jain D. Johnston ) Warden Varga, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the May 11, 2022 Report and Recommendation [103] of Magistrate Judge Jensen that Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution be granted and the case be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Any objection was to have been filed by May 25, 2022, and no objection has been received. Finding no error, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [103] in full. Defendants’ motion to dismiss [100] is granted, and the case is dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also McInnis v. Duncan, 697 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2012) (dismissal is appropriate sanction for repeated failure to attend hearings where plaintiff has been warned of the possibility of dismissal). The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment and mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff at his address on the docket.

Date: May 27, 2022 By: Sy \ SS Tain D. Johnston United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Patrick Adair, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 18 C 6305 Vv. ) ) Hon. Jain D. Johnston ) Warden Varga, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the May 11, 2022 Report and Recommendation [103] of Magistrate Judge Jensen that Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution be granted and the case be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Any objection was to have been filed by May 25, 2022, and no objection has been received. Finding no error, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [103] in full. Defendants’ motion to dismiss [100] is granted, and the case is dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also McInnis v. Duncan, 697 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2012) (dismissal is appropriate sanction for repeated failure to attend hearings where plaintiff has been warned of the possibility of dismissal). The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment and mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff at his address on the docket.

Date: May 27, 2022 By: Sy \ SS Tain D. Johnston United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Adair v. Varga, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adair-v-varga-ilnd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack