Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 694 F.3d 1312
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided February 8, 2012·No. 2011-1538·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ACTIVEVIDEO NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff-C'ross Appellcmt, a V. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., VERIZON SERVICES CORP., VERIZON VIRGINIA INC., AND VERIZON SOUTH INC., Defendants-Appellants. n 2011-1538, -1567, 2012-1129, -1201 Appea1s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in case no. 10-CV-0248, Judge Raym0nd A. Jackson. ON MOTION ORDER Up0n consideration of Veriz0n Com1nunications, Inc. et a1.’s unopposed motion to consolidate appeal no. 2012- 1201 with appeal nos. 2011~1538, 2011-1567, and 2012- 1129,

ACTIVEVIDEO V. V`ERIZON COM]VIUNICATION 2 IT IS ORDERED THAT2 The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected above. FEB 08 2012 FoR THE CoURT lsi J an Horbaly Date J an Horba1y Clerk ‘ cc: Michael J. Ly0ns, Esq. Michael K. Kel1ogg, Esq. s19 FlLED U.S. COURT DF APPEALS FDH THE FEDER.AL ClRCUlT FEB 0 8 2012 ih\\\H0nBALv cLEm<

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. (Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.