Acta-Fax Business Machines v. South Carolina Procurement Review Panel

325 S.E.2d 319, 283 S.C. 555, 1984 S.C. LEXIS 398
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 17, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 325 S.E.2d 319 (Acta-Fax Business Machines v. South Carolina Procurement Review Panel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acta-Fax Business Machines v. South Carolina Procurement Review Panel, 325 S.E.2d 319, 283 S.C. 555, 1984 S.C. LEXIS 398 (S.C. 1984).

Opinion

ORDER

All parties in this matter have petitioned the Court to determine the scope of authority of the South Carolina Procurement Review Panel.

The Procurement Review Panel was created by the legislature to serve as an advisory body to the Budget and Control Board in protests arising under S. C. Code Ann. §§ 11-35-4210,11-35-4220, and 11-35-4230 (Supp. 1983). It has no authority to make or rescind contracts, or to order the Division of General Services to do so. In protests arising under § 11-35-4210, the Panel is empowered only to determine whether an unsuccessful bidder should have been awarded a contract, and to make recommendations to the Budget and Control Board for relief to the aggrieved bidder. § 11-35-4210(7); § 11-35-4410(5) (Supp. 1983). Additionally, § 11-35-4210(6) provides that “the request for a review shall not stay the contract unless fraudulent.”

It is therefore ordered that the portion of the Procurement Review Board’s order of determination dated October 25, 1984, which purported to rescind existing contracts and to substitute Royal Business Machines, Inc., as contractor, is void.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. Leatherman
420 S.E.2d 843 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
325 S.E.2d 319, 283 S.C. 555, 1984 S.C. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acta-fax-business-machines-v-south-carolina-procurement-review-panel-sc-1984.