Acosta v. State
100 So. 3d 169, 2012 WL 4897431, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17963
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Acosta v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16734 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1251 (Fla.2001) (holding “the adjudication of a defendant as a habitual offender when the requisite ... felonies do not exist may be corrected pursuant to rule 3.800(a) so long as the error is apparent from the face of the record”); accord Rangel v. State, 937 So.2d 1218, 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Acosta v. State, 100 So. 3d 169, 2012 WL 4897431, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17963 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
100 So. 3d 169 (Acosta v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rangel v. State
937 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Bover v. State
797 So. 2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)