Acosta v. State
100 So. 3d 169, 2012 WL 4897431, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17963
This text of 100 So. 3d 169 (Acosta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Acosta v. State, 100 So. 3d 169, 2012 WL 4897431, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17963 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1251 (Fla.2001) (holding “the adjudication of a defendant as a habitual offender when the requisite ... felonies do not exist may be corrected pursuant to rule 3.800(a) so long as the error is apparent from the face of the record”); accord Rangel v. State, 937 So.2d 1218, 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rangel v. State
937 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Bover v. State
797 So. 2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 So. 3d 169, 2012 WL 4897431, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acosta-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.