Acosta v. Parra Perez

Opinion

WOO 1.497 UV VILE PAVE LE WY MVVULTIOCEI to PHM VOre1acy Payee +vr1re

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01224-AWI-EPG 9 Plaintiff, 10 ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR v. DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT MARIA 11 DEL CARMENT PARRA PEREZ, DOING MARIA DEL CARMEN PARRA PEREZ, BUSINESS AS LESLY’S GIFTS AND MORE, 12 | doing business as Lesly’s Gifts and More, et WITH PREJUDICE al., 13 (ECF No. 41) Defendants. 14 15 16 Plaintiff Maria del Carmen Parra Perez, doing business as Lesly's Gifts and More, and 17 | Defendant, Jose Acosta, have filed a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice all claims against 18 | Maria del Carmen Parra Perez, doing business as Lesly's Gifts and More.' (ECF No. 41.) 19 | Pursuant to the stipulation, the case against Maria del Carmen Parra Perez, doing business as 20 | Lesly's Gifts and More has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice only as to Maria del 21 | Carmen Parra Perez, doing business as Lesly's Gifts and More. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); 22 | Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). IS SO ORDERED. 23 24] Dated: _ August 21, 2020 [see ey 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 ' The other defendants in the action have not filed an answer to the second amended complaint and default has been 28 entered against them. (ECF No. 40.)

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27