Achieve Software Corp. v. Garg Data International, Inc.

225 F. App'x 454
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 14, 2007·No. No. 05-55405·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff Achieve Software Corporation, an Indiana corporation, and Defendant Garg Data International, Inc., a California [455] corporation, entered into a 1997 “Software License and Service Agreement” in which they promised to settle all contractual disputes through arbitration. Garg filed a demand for arbitration of a contractual dispute in 2003. The arbitrator issued a ruling in favor of Achieve. Garg challenges the validity of the arbitrator’s ruling on the ground that Achieve was ineligible to participate in arbitration because it had failed to pay California franchise taxes in 2000.

A foreign corporation that fails to pay California franchise tax forfeits its right to exercise corporate powers within the state. Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 23301. Such forfeiture precludes the corporation from conducing intrastate business in California. See Cal. Corp.Code § 2203(c). But “[maintaining or defending any action or suit or any administrative or arbitration proceeding, or effecting settlement thereof or the settlement of claims or disputes” is not “intrastate business.” See Cal. Corp. Code § 191(c)(1). Achieve was a corporation in good standing in Indiana at the time of the arbitration. Its failure to pay a state tax in California did not render it ineligible to participate in an arbitration conducted pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act. 9 U.S.C. § 10(a).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Achieve Software Corp. v. Garg Data International, Inc., 225 F. App'x 454 (9th Cir. 2007).

225 F. App'x 454 (Achieve Software Corp. v. Garg Data International, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related