Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Acevedo v. State

Acevedo v. State

882 So. 2d 409, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229, 2004 WL 2086304
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Acevedo v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20772 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 2004·No. No. 5D04-1591·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla.2002) (holding that Rule 3.800(a) motion is limited to issues which can be resolved as a matter of law, without an evidentiary hearing).

SHARP, W., THOMPSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acevedo v. State, 882 So. 2d 409, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229, 2004 WL 2086304 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

882 So. 2d 409 (Acevedo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burgess v. State
831 So. 2d 137 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)