Acevedo v. State
820 So. 2d 395, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7393, 2002 WL 1058834
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Acevedo v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 787 So. 2d 127 →
Opinion
We affirm the order denying postconviction relief as to point 2 on authority of Major v. State, 814 So.2d 424 (Fla.2002). As to point 1, the issue appears both time-barred (as it could have been brought during appellant’s incarceration) and moot. We see no merit in the claim of procedural error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Acevedo v. State, 820 So. 2d 395, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7393, 2002 WL 1058834 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
820 So. 2d 395 (Acevedo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Major v. State
814 So. 2d 424 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)