Acevedo v. Harvard Maintenance Company
This text of Acevedo v. Harvard Maintenance Company (Acevedo v. Harvard Maintenance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff, -against- 20 CIVIL 721 (AJN) JUDGMENT Harvard Maintenance Co., et al., Defendants.
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion & Order dated March 31, 2021, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED in part. The following claims are dismissed with prejudice: the NYCHRL against both defendants, the ADEA claims against defendants, the Title VII claims against Defendant Drazhi. The motion to dismiss is converted into a motion for summary judgment as to the Title VII claim against Harvard Maintenance, and the motion is GRANTED to the extent that the claims are predicated on Plaintiff's termination. The motion is denied as to the Title VII claim to the extent that it is based on acts other than Plaintiff's termination, but Defendant's alternative motion to compel arbitration is granted as to that claim. The Court thus dismisses the case in favor of arbitration as to the remaining claim. The Court finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 31, 2021 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: i man go Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Acevedo v. Harvard Maintenance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acevedo-v-harvard-maintenance-company-nysd-2021.