Abubuker v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 8, 2006·No. 05-2038·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2038

SOFIA HASSEN ABUBUKER,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-203-694)

Submitted: April 19, 2006 Decided: May 8, 2006

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rochelle A. Fortier Nwadibia, PRIVITERA & NWADIBIA, San Francisco, California, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Carol Federighi, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Sofia Hassen Abubuker, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of

relief. Our review discloses that the petition for review was

filed out of time. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(b)(1) (West 2005)

(establishing thirty-day time frame for filing petition for

review).

We accordingly dismiss the petition for review for lack

of jurisdiction. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abubuker v. Gonzales, (4th Cir. 2006).

Abubuker v. Gonzales (Abubuker v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
514 U.S. 386 (Supreme Court, 1995)